Gear Review: The Thomas and Thomas Contact II

European style nymphing rods have come a long way in the last five years. Manufacturers are keeping up with the sport by creating rods that cover a wider range of presentations with the ability to fish lighter nymphs at greater distances.

Thomas and Thomas remains a solid leader in this corner with a redesign of their popular and successful Contact series.

This is a layman’s review of two rods in the new Thomas and Thomas Contact II lineup: the 10’, three-weight, 4 piece (model 1003-4) and the 10’9″, three-weight, 4 piece (model 1093-4).

I’ll admit upfront that I’m partial to the T&T brand; it’s hard not to root for the home team. I like the idea that the rods are built a little more than an hour north of my home, and I’ve spent hundreds of hours on the water with one of the original Contact series rods (the 11’3″ model).  I reviewed that rod on this blog and it was a game changer for me then. So, my bias disclosed,  I now offer an honest assessment from the perspective of a regular guy who fishes regularly.

A few years ago, I began casually looking for a “crossover” rod, something that would allow me to tightline nymph and cast a dry fly reasonably well. Admittedly, you can do that with almost any trout rod, but I wanted something more purpose-built and something in the 10 foot range.  After talking with Grady Allen at UpCountry Sportfishing in New Hartford, CT, I had my eye on the T&T Contact 1003, released last year as part of the “Contact” line, but built on a new blank – the same blank that now makes up the “Contact II” line.

The Contact 1003. Up-locking version with walnut spacer and pewter hardware. I prefer this configuration to the standard down-locking version on the newer Contact II. Up-locking seats are available as an option for a $25 fee on the Contact II line.

When my good friend and fishing partner broke his nymph rod early this spring, the reality of being without it for a few months spurred a discussion about potential “back-up” rods.  I suggested the Contact 1003 and a call to Grady made sure two of them were set aside for us.

Due to the pandemic, we bought them sight unseen and without so much as a test jiggle at the rod rack – the T&T reputation was enough.  We hit the water with the new 10 footers and compared notes.
Contact/Contact II 10′ Three-Weight (1003) Initial Impression:

The 1003 felt comfortably light in the hand and with an up-locking reel seat, it balanced in the fore grip with a Hatch 4 plus reel (6.6 oz. with line and backing). As a rod builder myself, I scrutinize guide wraps and epoxy finish a bit more than most anglers. The new rod looked good with top of the line cork, REC components, and tasteful, brown/olive thread wraps.

The handwriting on the blank adds a bit of imperfect character that I appreciate. In fact, aesthetics was one reason I chose the T&T over competing rods from Sage and Orvis – the choice of components, thread color, and finish are of the sort that I would choose if building a rod myself.

More importantly, however, the action was crisp with a fast recovery. Less reverberation in the rod tip means a smoother and faster transition to a good drift because with good contact, those rod movements are transmitted to the fly.

Being so accustomed to the 11’3″ rod, the 1004 felt short at first, but the shorter length didn’t keep me from reaching most of my target drifts, especially with a light leader. Landing fish was considerably easier for me with the 10′ rod, as I often found extended lengths to be more of a liability in that department.

One day, I spooled up a three-weight floating line to see how well the 1003 would cast. My expectation was for adequate performance, but I was blown away at how well it cast, particularly in the mid range where most of my fishing occurs.

The Contact II 1093. Balanced nicely with my Hatch 4 plus (6.6 oz.) Note the down-locking reel seat with walnut spacer and matte black rings.

The summary of the initial impression: the rod was a joy to fish, it checked all of the blocks as a crossover rod, but didn’t quite replace my original 11’3″ Contact – the longer rod had its time and place.

Nevertheless, I suspected that I would choose the 1003 first on most days and as spring gave way to summer, that turned out to be true.

By July, my original Contact 1133 began to accumulate a thin layer of dust.  So I decided to sell it and put the money toward a 10’9″ Contact II when the first batch arrived at UpCountry, just in time for Independence Day.

By the way, the guys there are a wealth of knowledge on all of the T&T Contact rods and shop manager Torrey Collins is a T&T Ambassador. Give them a call, or if you’re fishing the Farmington, a visit to the shop is definitely time well spent.
Contact II 10’9″ Three-Weight (1093) Initial Impression:

Much like the 1003, the 1093 felt light, especially for the length (3.10 oz.) and also had a nice, quick recovery. I have to admit I’m not a fan of down-locking reel seats although they’ve become very popular on European nymphing rods.

I never had a balance issue with the up-locking seats and I like a fighting butt with a little bit of rod length behind the reel; it protects the reel when the rod is propped up on the ground and just looks better to me.

The Contact II series has an up-locking seat available as an option, which I would probably choose if I bought another one.  I also prefer the older reel seat to the matte black version used on the Contact II; the black may be more stealthy, but honestly, if my reel seat is what spooks the fish, then it just wasn’t meant to be.

The guide spacing was redesigned on the Contact II line with a low-rider stripping guide moved closer to the reel in order to avoid line sag which is ultimately transmitted to your flies as drag.  Micro-thin leaders can be a challenge to cast, but the rod handled a 20 to 22 ft. micro leader (six to eight lb. mono tapered to a rod length of 6x tippet) very well.

If you’re not careful, these leaders can easily get fouled on the tip guides, but I found the rod to be very forgiving. With the light leader, I fished farther away with this 10’9″ rod than I was able to with the longer 11’3″ contact. The 1093 also performed beautifully as an overhead dry fly rod and I used it often this summer, especially for delicate presentations with a long (20ft) tapered dry fly leader and a weight-forward floating line. The action of these rods offer superior protection for light tippet.

The summary of my initial impression: the 1093 satisfied my desire for a longer rod while still checking the crossover block with excellent dry fly performance.
Six-Month Impression:

So, after a summer and fall on the water, I remain impressed and satisfied with both the 1003 and 1093.  Versatility is perhaps their greatest attribute.

Case in point, I would frequently begin an outing by tightline nymphing and then with a change of spools, rig up a three-weight floating line to fish single dry fly or a dry and dropper.  Sometimes I would tightline nymph my way upstream and then work back down with a brace of wet flies or a streamer.

Amazing versatility for a purpose-built nymph rod. With a three-weight floating line, both rods excelled at long leader, delicate dry fly presentations.

I fished “micro” European nymphing leaders much of the time on both the 1003 and 1093, and both rods handled them very well.  You can take almost any rod and Czech nymph a heavy anchor fly but fishing a single, 2.5mm tungsten beaded nymph at long range is a different story and in my opinion, that’s where these rods really shine.  They have the sensitivity you would expect from top-tier nymph rods.

In fact, after landing a fish I often struggle to recall whether I detected the take by sight or feel, a testament not to my foggy memory but to the fact that, properly configured, these rods facilitate a sort of sixth sense of strike detection.

It’s difficult to rate one over the other in terms of overall versatility; perhaps the 1093 gets a slight edge for the added reach but there are many situations where I appreciate the shorter 10 foot length, especially in tight quarters. So far, they both remain free of dust in my quiver.

These are definitely premium rods and the price tag reflects that, but when you factor in the quality of the components and the tremendous versatility, they’re a really good value. If you’re an experienced angler looking to upgrade, or you’re looking for your first European nymphing rod and want one of the best available, a Contact II might become your new favorite. If you’re fortunate enough to have a local fly shop that carries them, please consider giving them your business.

Tight Lines.

Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

20 thoughts on “Gear Review: The Thomas and Thomas Contact II

  1. You nailed it, I myself own the 11’2 and the 10’9
    3 w and they are by far the best so far in my opinion. Actually going to Upcounty today to pick up the 10 3 but was considering the 2 w also for some light fight use. I have the avantt 5 w and grabbing the exosett ss 6 w today also. I’m a t&t junkie now. Broke tips on both 109 and avantt and replacement was a snap… contact took a few more weeks with this dam covid deal but avantt was only a few weeks. They are a stand up company and will continue to by there rods for years to come. Enjoy them once you own one… I know you will!!!

    1. Thanks, Steve. I really think breaks are inevitable with euro rods unfortunately, so a decent backup is nice. Let us know which 10 footer you end up with.
      P.S., you’ll like the Exocett SS 160, its a nice rod for mid sized streamers. Just match a line by grain weight and head length. The sweet spot on that rod, in my opinion, is right around 160-180. A 200 grain line will be a bit much.

  2. Thanks Damon, I went with the 10-2w but out of stock unfortunately… have to wait till mid-end of January but that’s ok. I’ll wait for perfection.. and on the line.. for now I have an mpx to start as I own it already. I’ll upgrade once I see what she’s about in my practice/bass pond.. lol. Thanks again for the info.

  3. My favorite sinking line for the SS 160 was the 150gr Rio 24 ft sink tip. I have the SS 200 now and with floating lines, I found that I needed to read the fine print of head length and weight because all 6/7/8 weights are not equal.
    The 2 weight should be a lot of fun, enjoy!

  4. I’ll def give it a try. Just went and chucked a small articulated sculpin with the 6 wt mpx.. not bad but sure could be better. No grain wt on the box. I’ll have to look on line.. think it’s rite at 160.. by the way… no bass or BG while testing. Would have been nice to see the action. Next time.. again, thanks for the chat and info. Looking forward to more of your reads!

    Happy holidays

    1. Depending on your casting style and the type of big stuff you’re throwing, you may want to size up. Looks like MPX is 175gr at 30ft.
      Happy New Year.

      1. Damon, got the 10’ 2 wt today.. super sensitive, highly accurate rod. Love it after only 2 hrs on the farm. No fish but cold and fun. I did feel and set on every rock I felt though. Lol.

        1. Hi Steve, just saw this – I’m intrigued by some of the 2 weight options as my own interests seem to trend lighter. Might be time to sell some equipment…

  5. Dam… small world .. well great to finally meet you, not sure which one you were but we def have to fish together at some point. I frequently go to the salmon in east Haddam or the Farmington. Open for any river that has fish in it though.. hope you guys had an awesome day yesterday.
    413-770-1923, txt me if you want to fish in the future.

  6. So did you have the sindacate rod I spoke to about euro or the torque reel guy? Other guy didn’t say much.. lol

  7. Thanks for the honest review – too many reviews out there are just clearly ads for rods saying they can do it all. I would like to get your thoughts on the backbone of the contact II 10’9” (compared to say your contact I 11’3”)? I have fished the the contact I version of both models and found the contact I 10’9” to lack a bit of backbone for bigger fish (whereas the 11’3” did not).

    thanks very much

    1. I haven’t fished the 10’9″ Contact 2, but having fished a lot with both the Contact 1 and 2 at the 11’+ size, I can say the Contact 2 has a stiffer backbone.

  8. Hi Damon,

    Greetings from Bhutan!

    Great Review!! One of the most helpful reviews around for the Contact 2. I was hoping you would be so kind to share which WF line you used or preferred for dry fly fishing. Thanks.

    Blue Skies and Happiness,
    Singhey Gyamtsho

  9. Sorry for the late response. I’m a fan of the Sunray Jeremy Lucas micro thin presentation line in 3 weight for both the 10 ft and 10’9 3 weight Contact II.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *